News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Prior Lake, Minnesota • (952) 447-6669

Prior Lake Resident's GuideLocal Worship DirectoryPrior Lake Foreclosure Data

Prior Lake, Minnesota

Keep up with the American! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

Advertising

Editorial: Lind can’t serve school district, self at same time


» Read similar stories filed under:

Back in our Nov. 17 issue, we criticized residents calling for
Chris Lind’s resignation as a Prior Lake-Savage Area School Board member-elect.
We did so because Lind, no matter how people feel about him, won a seat on the
board fair and square in a public election.

But that was before Lind threatened to sue the school district
for his June 18, 2007
termination as a district employee. The news came last week that Lind’s
attorney, David Thompson, had served the district with a notice-of-claim letter
demanding a monetary settlement for damages.

We seriously question whether Lind can be an effective leader on
the School Board in a district he plans to sue.

As we wrote in that Nov. 17 editorial, Lind will become an
elected official when he takes the oath of office at the Monday, Jan. 14 board
meeting. Since his election, this newspaper’s staff and many others in the
community have called on Lind to reach out in an open, direct manner,
explaining the circumstances of his firing. He has not done so, and now, with
news of his planned lawsuit against the district, he presumably cannot.

As a result, Lind won’t be able to serve both himself and the
school district. Therefore, we urge Lind to reconsider his plans to take
office.

By all appearances, Lind has not broken the law and is simply
doing what he has the legal right to do. However, he has given the impression
that he’s content to allow speculation about his circumstances to divide this
community – not exactly what most people would expect from an elected official.

We wonder how Lind could sit quietly in his seat Monday night
when the School Board discusses, in open forum, his request for a monetary
settlement. But that’s what he’ll have to do.

The irony of Lind’s situation – as attorneys have made clear –
is that if he chooses to file an official suit against the district, his
personnel file and any school district documents regarding Lind’s termination
will become public.

The further irony is that, whether the circumstances of Lind’s
firing are made public or forever shielded from the community’s view, Lind will
find it very difficult to do what he claims to have set out to do by running
for School Board.

Advertisement. Article continues below.

As Lind said in our Oct. 27 candidate Q & A, “I believe in
being open, honest and specific so you know what I believe.”

We hope he abides by that promise.

 

Editorials are among several
opinion and commentary pieces appearing regularly in this newspaper. Unless
otherwise noted, all editorials that appear in this spot are written by the
editor of the
Prior Lake American.

 




No further comments need to...

Back to page top

No further comments need to be made. Thank you Prior Lake American. We hope all community members will take the time to read your column.


Submitted by NotOnTheSideLine on January 11, 2008 - 6:12pm.

Respectfully, Voters rule,...

Back to page top

Respectfully, Voters rule, not individuals.
Dan
Swanson


Submitted by swannyww on January 14, 2008 - 12:20pm.

And your point then would...

Back to page top

And your point then would be?


Submitted by Rational Thought on January 14, 2008 - 2:16pm.

KRaM A good journalist will...

Back to page top

KRaM
A good journalist will include the "who, what, where, when, why and how" in the lead of a story, so "why, why, why, why, why" doesn't cut it with me.

Why? Why is Mr. Chris Lind being wrongly persecuted to the point that he is unable to support his wife and four children?

Why? Why have misinformation, half truths, distorted "facts", out-right lies and emotional responses to these things been so emphasized in our local newspapers and those of our neighboring school districts, as well as Minneapolis and St.Paul?

Why? Why do people believe only one side of a story without getting down to the truth?

Why? Why do people believe outrageous rumors about what Mr. Lind has been accused rather than search out the truth?

Why? Why do people not understand that the school district has treated Mr. Lind not only unfairly, but illegally?

One cable network calls its news "Fair and Balanced" but in my opinion it is not fair nor balanced. I had hoped that the newspapers in our communities would be fair and balanced but in my opinion they often have been neither. Some examples are below.

FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind refused to be on the finance committe of the school board even though he campaigned partially on finances.
TRUTH: Mr. Lind accepted the position on the finance committee and also asked to be on the curriculum and building committees.
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind was accused of several inappropriate actions that led to his dismissal.
TRUTH: Mr. Lind was accused of three incidents.
FALSEHOOD:According to many, Dr. Westerhaus stated the main reason he resigned is because Mr. Lind was elected and caused the levy and referendum to fail.
TRUTH: Mr. Lind was elected with over 3000 votes and was 4th in a list of 8 candidates.
The levy and referendum failed because local issues are the only way people can protest high taxes and wasteful spending, or not being satisfied with something. Dr. Westerhaus unfortunately was not of the same mentality as Minnesota's (and South Dakota's) Hubert Horatio Humphey "who did not turn away after defeat". (Quote from the Opinion Exchange section of the "Minneapolis Star Tribune" on Sunday January 13.) Our school district has a history of many levies and referenda being defeated up to three times before being passed. In addition to this, Mr. Lind has only 1 of 7 votes on the school board and Dr. Westerhaus, who has been such a successful superintendent, evidentally felt that was a threat to him and his record. How unfortunate for our district!
FALSEHOOD: Our local newspapers are unbiased.
TRUTH: If so, why was the letter supporting Mr. Lind from a girl who is on the student council at Prior Lake High School published but not put online like letters of those who have opposed and in many instances, slandered Mr. Lind?
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind ridiculed a girl by telling her it was "National Pick On Lesbian Day".
TRUTH: The girl has written a noterized letter stating that she was not rediculed as was a part of the "joke". It may have been a foolish thing for Mr. Lind to say but in light of the student involved it was not serious. It became "serious" when someone supposedly heard Mr. Lind's part of the conversation,and supposedly reported it to Mr. Massura and Mr. Massura recorded this heresay information.
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind spoke of celibacy with a child.
TRUTH: When approached by a young man who had graduated two years previously and who asked Mr. Lind about Biblical perspectives on celebicy, Mr. Lind spoke of St. Paul's gift from God to be able to be celibate if one wanted to, or was expected to be so.
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind spoke of bi-sexuality with a child.
TRUTH: The child was an upper-classman who asked what to do because his girl friend was bi-sexual. The conversation was limited because Mr. Lind evidentally was told by the boy that he was going to break up with his girl friend any way, so Mr. Lind did not even have to answer the question.
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind has threatened to sue the school district for a six figure amount.
TRUTH: No amount was stated in the letter asking for mediation. Mr. Lind is only trying to clear his name so he can support his family.
FALSEHOOD: Parents are informed about their children's activities and classes in our schools.
TRUTH: Those young people who are in need of council because of sexual concerns can be a part of the GLTB(Q) group, which I heard is called a "class" without their parents knowledge or permission. Girls who become pregnant have been counseled and even had arrangements made by school employees for their abortions without parental knowledge.
FALSEHOOD: Mr. Lind is inappropriate in his relationships with students and other young people.
TRUTH: Mr. Lind tells those who come to him and ask his opinion about Biblical perspective on issues of sexuality responds to them in love and Biblical passages, which many of us believe are the infallible TRUTH of God. Therefore young people are given a choice of what to believe. Similar questions may be about the theory of evolution and the theory of Intelligent Design and so students are given choices to consider. I thought "choice" was very important in our society!

The battle in our community today is not only about Mr. Lind, Dr. Westerhaus and Mr. Massurus and those of differing opinions. It is a battle of truth versus lies, rumors and distorted facts. Perhaps, I dare say, it is even a battle between Love and Hatred. If God is Love, as His Word states, who is Hatred? A law of physics says that for every reality their is an opposite.

The misinformed, gullible and ignorant people are not Hatred. They are perhaps deceived. It remains to be judged which camp I am in. In which are you?


Submitted by frogsong on January 14, 2008 - 4:59pm.

Frogsong, From your post,...

Back to page top

Frogsong,

From your post, you obviously have access to sources that are beyond what is available to the general public. I have yet to see the exact specifics for which Mr. Lind was disiplined - which is at the start of this entire controversy. If you don't, then your statements are as much conjecture as the rest of the statements that have been made in the public discourse and therefore simply add to the ongoing controversy.

Until Mr. Lind files a lawsuit (and the records become available to the public) or Mr. Lind voluntarily releases his records, conjecture is all that can occur.

Mr. Lind - search your heart and come to a decision. End this controversy one way or the other. Either file and get on with the lawsuit, or release the records so the truth can come out. If you were truly wronged, then you deserve compensation for damages. If not, then consider how this controversy is affecting the children and the school district for whom you have just sworn to serve in the best interest.


Submitted by Huninn on January 15, 2008 - 2:37pm.

Well stated frogsong! Chris...

Back to page top

Well stated frogsong! Chris Lind has remained silent as not to have any statements taken out of context by our media who thrive on creating controversy and slanting a story to fit their agenda. What is taking place in Prior Lake is a form of "Bullying or Mobbing", which the school district forbids but is guilty of by Westerhaus and Massaros.
A group of the Stand by Me committee have continued to degrade Mr. Lind in the newspapers and media. Their agenda was to publically degrade Mr Lind and force him to quit. They then would be able to have Westerhaus stay. Is Westerhaus a part of this plan? Mr Lind is not a quitter like Westerhaus and has not allowed the media and special interest groups to manipulate him. The real truth may come out in the courtroom with witnesses and not a con-cocked report from an HR person and his attorney sidekick. Both of those administrators should be fired by the board for poor decisions which may cost this district plenty! I hope Mr Lind and his attorney takes them to court!
Here is the website about "Bullying and Mobbing". Think about all the the degrading articles, emails, phone calls, and public humiliation this group and newspaper has put Mr.Lind through.

http://www.peu1.org/media/documents/emotionalabuse.pdf

The word "mobbing" denotes a behavior by coworkers, superiors or subordinates, who attack a colleague's dignity,
integrity, and competence, repeatedly, over a number of weeks, months, or even years. A person is being subjected to
emotional abuse, subtly or bluntly, often falsely accused of wrongdoing, and is persistently humiliated. Dr. Heinz
Leymann, a psychologist and medical scientist, pioneered the research about this workplace issue in Sweden in the
early 80s. He identified the behavior as mobbing and described it as "psychological terror" involving "hostile and
unethical communication directed in a systematic way by one or a few individuals mainly towards one individual."
Mobbing is emotional abuse committed directly or indirectly by one or a group of co-workers directed at anybody.
People who have been affected by mobbing are suffering immensely. The social and economic impact of the mobbing
syndrome has yet to be measured in quantitative terms. Mobbing can only persist as long as it is allowed to persist.
Organizational leadership plays the most important part in its prevention. By enforcing decency, civility, and high
ethical standards in the workplace and by creating a nourishing environment, bullying and mobbing will not surface.

I do believe after this is all said and done this community will owe Mr. Lind a public apology!


Submitted by PLsince1976 on January 14, 2008 - 8:12pm.

If you, or the rest of Mr....

Back to page top

If you, or the rest of Mr. Lind's supporters, want to really teach our children something, than maybe you should come to terms with the phrase "personal responsibility." I believe the truth lies somewhere in between what we know, but for Mr. Lind to continue to push his problems onto others through the words of his supporters and his refusal to set the record straight teaches nothing to our students.

And you can forget about the conspiracy theory against him, his God or anything else as well. It doesn't exist, and the paper isn't going to ask him for his side of the story just so they can misquote or misrepresent what he says. Get over yourselves.


Submitted by Rational Thought on January 14, 2008 - 10:21pm.

Could you be so kind as to...

Back to page top

Could you be so kind as to cite what degrading comments have been made by Dr. Westerhouse or Mr. Massaros regarding Mr. Lind for the public record? Which members of the Stand-by-me committee have degraded Mr. Lind in public, and what statements have they made that are degrading? I agree that many people have raised questions and concerns. I agree that many people have called for Mr. Lind to resign. How is asking questions and raising concerns a personal attack on Mr. Lind?


Submitted by Huninn on January 15, 2008 - 2:53pm.

For the record, the Prior...

Back to page top

For the record, the Prior Lake American has repeatedly attempted to get Chris Lind to speak with us for the stories we've published. He has refused, and continues to refuse, to do so.

 


Submitted by Lori Carlson on January 14, 2008 - 8:44pm.

I really wish people would...

Back to page top

I really wish people would stop bashing The Prior Lake American!!!! This Newspaper provides the community with a wealth of information, come on without this Titan of the newspaper industry I never would of known Isabelle and Tyler were top baby names in 2007 at St. Francis or I wouldnt have something to lay down on the floor to train my puppy.


Submitted by noconfidence on January 15, 2008 - 10:47am.

I can't believe you guys are...

Back to page top

I can't believe you guys are still arguing this point!!

Chris Lind was elected to the School Board!!
Chris Lind has the right to sue is there anything that says he cant? No there is not!! Now if you don't like it then vote against Chris I know I will if he does sue ( And I voted for him).

Dr. Ididngetmywayhaus is gone,finished,out of here. No amount of whining is going to keep him, his meal ticket was voted down quite frankly I always thought he was sub par anyways, ( I guess so did Wayzata).

Programs are going to be cut suck it up!!! Talk to your City leaders tell them to get some business in Prior Lake to offset the tax base. If your kid wants to play a sport in school I guess you will have to pony up for it I know I will, If your kid wants to play in the band again pony up for it, If you want your kid to go to wolfridge again pony up for it.

But for gods sake stop beating this horse its already dead!!!


Submitted by noconfidence on January 16, 2008 - 10:59pm.

The issue is still very much...

Back to page top

The issue is still very much alive with the threat of a lawsuit. My contention would never be for Mr. Lind to step down so Dr. Weterhaus can stay, as I know that he wouldn't anyway and that Chris was elected.

By suing the district, which is his right, it presents a conflict of interest for Mr. Lind. All the while, he stays silent and won't defend/explain himself to those who are confused or want some answers as to why the district was wrong in firing him, what he really did, etc. In fact, the very notion that he won't face his critics and stand for what is apparently "the truth" in the eyes of his supporters is fairly hypocritical to the actions of that which his religious beliefs are based on.


Submitted by Rational Thought on January 17, 2008 - 9:46am.

Advertising

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Who's new

  • Ultima09
  • bugaga
  • sommop
  • dv-meyer@msn.com
  • SheilaM

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 155 guests online.

Advertising

Advertising