
Motorbuys | Local Jobs |
Homes |
Rental Property |
Coupons |
Garage Sales|
Classifieds | Worship | ShopNow
|
July 20, 2008, 1:52 pm
|
Advertising |
Welcome to the new plamerican.com, the home page of the Prior Lake American newspaper. Let us know what you think of the changes to the site.
Got a news tip? Email us, or call us at (952) 447-6669
|
Search |
User loginAdvertisingEmail Edition
Type in your email address and click "Subscribe" to receive our E-mail Edition in your inbox.
PollWe know you read the online version of the Prior Lake American. Do you read the print edition? I subscribe, and I read the print edition for more detail. 60% I don’t subscribe, but I read it elsewhere. 9% I don’t subscribe, but I occasionally pick up the print edition at the store. 2% I used to subscribe, but I don’t anymore. 9% I never read the print edition. 21% Total votes: 57 |
![]() Board spots split among incumbents, new faces
November 8, 2007 - 1:58pm — Joanna Miller
By Joanna Miller Staff Writer
Voters selected two incumbents and two newcomers to fill four open three-year spots on the Prior Lake-Savage Area School Board Tuesday. Incumbent Diane Ziemann gained the highest number of votes, garnering 16 percent. Incumbent Eric Pratt followed with just over 14 percent. Pratt barely overtook newcomers to the board, Dee Dee Francis (with 14 percent of the vote) and Chris Lind (also with 14 percent), to round out the newly elected candidates. Ziemann said she plans to continue with her election platform to listen to public input, she added. “I ran on being able to listen. I encourage anyone with concerns to give me a call. I very much want to listen to what people want and their needs,” she said. In reaction to the failed levy and bond referendums, Ziemann said she’s saddened. “The community spoke loudly on that. I don’t like the results. It directly affects the education of our children,” she said. Incumbent Eric Pratt said being re-elected was a highlight, while the levy and bond results were frustrating. “I can’t tell you how pleased I am to have the opportunity to serve our district again. It’s a very humbling feeling to know your friends and neighbors trust you [in that role.] I’m thrilled to have the opportunity to serve,” he said. Pratt thought the levy and bond would both pass. “I thought we did a good job of articulating the need. Our volunteers worked tirelessly,” he said. Pratt said the board has discussed what to do if the two items failed at a high level, but it will now delve into the budget process specifically. The board anticipated about $1 million in budget cuts should the levy fail. Newly elected Dee Dee Francis agreed that she’s excited about being chosen to serve, but the failed levy and bond will impact her position. “I’m thrilled. I’m a little humbled by the support I had,” she said. Francis said that the results for the levy and bond will make her new position harder. “It will make things difficult. It would have been an easier job if it would have passed. We have more work to do,” she said. Francis said existing levies may have swayed voters. “I think the fact that there was already an existing one in place had something to do with it, and the dollar amount, too,” she said. Newly elected Chris Lind said he and his family anxiously awaited results Tuesday evening. “I’m honestly surprised that I made the board,” Lind said. “I’m very happy.” Lind worked as a campus supervisor at Prior Lake High School before being fired for insubordination before the current school year. Lind said many current and former high-school students came to the polls to vote. “I received so many e-mails from past students that voted for the first time. They were engaged into the process because I was running,” he said. Lind said he feels the budget issues need to be at the forefront of the board’s agenda. “If this year we show a lot of financial improvement, I think it would validate a levy next year,” he said. Lind would like to find a way for people who voted in favor of the levy to make contributions to the district to lessen the impact of the failed levy. “I think there is a need for a more modest levy,” Lind said. He looks forward to bringing new ideas to the board as well as learning from board members who have already served. “New people on the board are just there for awhile learning the ropes,” Lind said. “I will definitely use the board members who have been on there [for] their feedback and ideas.” Of the other candidates in the running, incumbent ****** Booth earned more than 12 percent of the vote. John Myser had 11 percent, Michael Von Arx had 9.5 percent, and Greg Bores followed with 9 percent. Joanna Miller can be reached at (952) 345-6375 or jmiller@swpub.com.
|
Advertising |
Mr. Lind - this is your...
Back to page topMr. Lind - this is your solution to the problem of under funded education? Have the people of this community that supported the referendum pay for it? Are you delusional? It will be interesting to see you fulfill your campaign promises - more teachers, more programs (world language and extra curricular), less fundraising, lower fees, more money for staff development, fiscal responsibility, with no additional levy money. And as you promised in your campaign and was reported on in this paper (see http://www.plamerican.com/node/3550), if you can't, you'll resign.
I don't see Chris' comment...
Back to page topI don't see Chris' comment as delusional, I think it is being creative. Why let a failed referendum stop a dedicated supporter from funding the levy? They don't need a tax hike to send money to the district, they can give the district all the money they want.
Not creative, but instead...
Back to page topNot creative, but instead putting the entire burden on a smaller subset of the population. Read Chris' platform. He claims that he's tired of all the fund raising that comes home. Well, when the district is under funded and we receive $500 less per student than the average district, how is he going to balance the budget? He can't have it both ways. You can't claim you don't want to see so much fund raising but you don't want to pay higher taxes. Basic economics my friend.
Let me Get This Straight So,...
Back to page topLet me Get This Straight
So, if the people in favor of the referendum are going to make contributions, should we just allow their kids to participate in the programs that are surely to be cut? Should we just start a school within a school and have the kids of the people that support education in one wing and the rest in the other? He is delusional and he has no idea what he is doing.
I agree...and for this we...
Back to page topI agree...and for this we lost one of the best superintendents in the state. Thanks voters!
Okay LeftRightCenter and...
Back to page topOkay LeftRightCenter and Cares about Education I agree with you that Mr. Lind hasn't a clue about school funding, etc. He, however, did legitimately get voted into office - most likely because he was the most known of the NO candidates and he was able to get the younger adults to come out and vote for him. But we all have to live with this outcome.
So, how do we educate an entire community that this man was fired rightfully and not because of his religious beliefs. Ironically, we have a Christian (Dr. Westerhaus) firing another Christian (Mr. Lind). That being said, how do we educate them that it is okay to like Mr. Lind but that at this juncture we need school board members who know the score and what is ahead. More critical, we cannot afford to loose our superintendent over this situation. If Mr. Lind cannot see why he was fired in the first place, I doubt he will be able to understand the costs to the community with Dr. Westerhaus' departure. Yes, Dr. Westerhaus is replaceable - but do we want to incur more costs at this time and more delays training in a new Superintendent when we have the State's best employed right now?
Tonight, the School Board stated they would glady reconsider Dr. Westerhaus' resignation if he changed his mind. Dr. Westerhaus stated clearly he could not work for a man he believes he rightfully terminated for the district. He stated he did not make the decision to fire Mr. Lind lightly and that many had thought Mr. Lind should have been terminated sooner. In over 20 years as a School Administrator, he has only terminated 4 people - Dr. Westerhaus knew what he was doing was in the best interests of this district.
So it is clear, Dr. Westerhaus is gone unless this community can convince Mr. Lind that just as he ran for this election because of his concern for kids - he should resign for the exact same reason. Our kids and this district need Dr. Westerhaus.
Chris Lind has done more for...
Back to page topChris Lind has done more for the students at PLHS than probably any other teacher in that school. He has helped many students through a lot of hard decisions and he has been a great role-model for all of the students at PLHS. He is an adult that is trusted amoung the students. A lot of students went to Chris Lind for guidance and instruction.
Chris may have been there...
Back to page topChris may have been there for you, or some poeple you know, or maybe even many others, but there are people that have been in that high school for 25+ years that have touched countless lives over those years. Don't disrespect them by saying that in 4 years time, Mr. Lind did more than any other teacher in that school. That's rediculous.
The key question about...
Back to page topThe key question about Chris Lind is this -- was he licensed to give students guidance? You might wonder, "Why might that be important to parents, students and the school district?" Mr. Lind was employed as a campus supervisor. And although I'm not a district administrator (nor to I play one in a TV series), it seems to me that if he was dispensing advice and was not licensed to do so, then there might be a liability issue for the school district. Although not much has been released about this situation, people need to go back to the basic facts. Mr. Lind was employed as a campus supervisor -- period. He was reprimanded on several occasions for doing things that seem to have been outside of his job description. It seems he continued to do that and was warned not to do so -- which in the work world is called "insubordination" and is sufficient grounds for dismissal. As well, Mr. Lind supposedly talked with students about topics involving sexuality. When is that appropriate -- especially in a school where the person accussed of talking about sexuality is an adult and the person they are talking to is a student?
It is my understanding that...
Back to page topIt is my understanding that Chris never spoke to a student at length without parental notification and consent.
That is a huge difference, and the inference of an adult talking with a student about sex without that context is irresponsible.
Don't Diss Chris! I went to...
Back to page topDon't Diss Chris! I went to school with Chris and as far as I remember...I looked up to him...He was very active in School acivities and a very intelligent person...I am sure he knows what he is doing....Hello Chris from an old school mate! To give you a clue....My best friend was Nell...Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family...