News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Prior Lake, Minnesota • (952) 447-6669

Prior Lake Resident's GuideLocal Worship DirectoryPrior Lake Foreclosure Data

Prior Lake, Minnesota

Keep up with the American! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

What do you think about the proposed cell-phone legislation?


» Read similar stories filed under:

Minnesota House and Senate legislators have proposed a bill that would double the fines of any moving violation if the driver was on their cell phone at the time of the violation.

What do you think about this proposal?

Is it responsible law making?

Is it unfair to double the price of a ticket for talking on the phone?

Do you think this legislation can save lives?

Or is it legislation that would drain people’s pocket books?

Is it possible to talk on the phone and drive responsibly?


Advertisement



If all scientific data...

Back to page top

If all scientific data points to using cell phones and driving being a hazardous combination, then they should legislate a complete ban for driving with cell phones.

This is an all-or-nothing proposition. Legislators must decide if it's dangerous enough to take away a personal freedom.

If it's only dangerous enough to tack on a ticket to drivers already committing moving violations, then it's just padding the government's pocket book, right?
Why not ticket drivers who are eating and driving, or doing their makeup and driving, in the same situation?
What sets cell phone use apart from other distractions in a vehicle?

 

 


Submitted by Joanna Miller on February 14, 2007 - 2:46pm.

"If it's only dangerous...

Back to page top

"If it's only dangerous enough to tack on a ticket to drivers already committing moving violations, then it's just padding the government's pocket book, right?"

-I think the theory is that the cell phone use CAUSES the moving violations rather than it just being a coincidence and a chance for government pocket book padding.
I agree that driver distractions don't end with cell phones and drivers should use common sense to determine their limits with talking and driving rather than passing this bill. For instance, don't talk on your cell phone and weave in and out of traffic going 80 MPH. If they pass this bill, where would it stop? My radio has caused me to zone out from time to time, heaters make me all warm and sleepy, blinking turn signals are impossible not to stare at...


Submitted by Mark Gores on February 15, 2007 - 11:52am.

  I agree with Joanna and...

Back to page top

 

I agree with Joanna and Mark. Some of the driver distractions I've seen are equally as bad (or worse than) driving and talking on the phone. I have actually seen two men on two separate occasions SHAVING while driving. That has to be bad.

 

 


Submitted by Lori Carlson on February 15, 2007 - 11:56am.

Does it warrant a double...

Back to page top

Does it warrant a double fine if a phone is involved during a traffic violation?

Why the extra cash? Both "phone" and "shaving-in-car" drivers caused the same level of danger on the road.

If the point of the extra fine is to drive home that cell phones are a major safety concern behind the wheel, why not propose a ban?

Another question: Will the thought of an additional fine be enough to keep drivers off of their phones in the car everyday, or will it mean they'll continue the same habits and just pay more if they get pulled over?

 

 

 

 


Submitted by Joanna Miller on February 15, 2007 - 1:12pm.

I will admit that when I see...

Back to page top

I will admit that when I see the sign "Fines double in contruction zones", I make sure I am not speeding. Although I would take caution around road crews under any circumstances, it still makes me double check my speed.

I think the only solution to the problem is to make people take a talking while driving certification test before being issued a license. Those that pass get a little picture of a cell phone on the back of their license giving them a "hall pass" to use their cell phones when driving because they proved that they (along with 8 out of 10 drivers) are completely capable of talking while driving.


Submitted by Mark Gores on February 15, 2007 - 3:20pm.

Maybe it's just me, but...

Back to page top

Maybe it's just me, but don't we already have a citation available for police to tack onto other driving violations for innatentive driving?

I think it's called careless driving.

Instead of passing legislation against civil rights, let police do their job the way they see fit. If someone is speeding and they cross over the median because they are on their cell phone, the citation is speeding and careless driving. If they get into an accident, it is reckless driving.

 


Submitted by Shawn Hogendorf on February 15, 2007 - 4:47pm.

Complete ban? I like the...

Back to page top

Complete ban? I like the sounds of that. There are so many other distractions on the road we don't need to add to the list. I think everyone putting others at risk as well as themselves deserve a consequence. Use your noodle and keep your eyes on the road!
Driving demands your full attention unless you are on a road in North Dakota and can see 50 miles ahead of you and behind you and to the left...heck you can almost read a book! Just kidding.
In the blink of an eye...anything could happen. Think about it.


Submitted by acorn squash on March 24, 2007 - 4:49pm.

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Advertising

Who's new

  • tom.fredrickson
  • Rachel Henry
  • jamesgilmore
  • StevenGU
  • Jill Schaefer

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 167 guests online.

Advertising

1

Advertising