I am not sure but Dr Westerhaus may not have applied initially but may have been approached or pursued unsolicited from another district.
There is so much about all this that we don't know, don't need to know and probably will never know.
As saddened as I am that he is leaving, please let him move on. We must focus on moving forward with the changes and challenges we now face in the district.
Please set a good example for our children and deal with this situation with compassion for all involved. Life is too short and far too precious for all the time and energy being spent on this issue.
With all that's written regarding the supt of schools decision to leave, and specifically his stated rationale for leaving, why haven't the obvious questions been asked? Isn't he responsible for management of the district's budget? Isn't he responsible for the success/failure of any referendum deemed necessary to operate the schools? In my opinion, he has pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, refocusing the discussion away from his obvious failures and instead blaming a single individual, a former employee, now a board member who the voters elected by a comfortable margin.
As a new resident (September), I watched the actions following the recent election with "no dog in the fight", so to speak. And astonishment.
If I'm not mistaken, Westerhaus has voiced "threats" to leave earlier. Especially with that in mind, his recent statements strike me as being akin to a child's "If you don't play my way, I'm gonna take my marbles and go home."
Definitely not behavior that sets an example for Students. And, were I serving on another district's school board, I would keep that in mind in considering any job application.
The divisiveness his words have created is hardly a worthy legacy to leave - and it certainly wouldn’t look good on anyone’s resume.
From having personal conversations with Dr. Westerhaus, he was very willing to deal with the budget cuts, monetary issues and eveyrthing else surrounding the failed referendum. I think many in the district were disappointed that it didn't pass. His sole reason for leaving is his unwillingness to work for someone who he recommended for termination. Personally and professionally, he couldn't do that.
If I were faced with that, I do not believe I could work for someone in that situation either.
Are you on this story Prior Lake American?!? What does this mean for the district financially speaking? Why a 3 year leave of absence? I thought he was applying for other jobs.
Our reporter, Joanna Miller, was at last night's meeting where the resignation was discussed. Look for her story today, here on our Web site, and in Saturday's print edition.
Interesting note on the Rule of 90 mentioned in the story, I believe that educators throughout the state may see the Rule of 90 go away, and are fighting to keep it in place.
Well at least we know we did not have a true leader on the school board. In times of adversary, is when people need true leaders. I have read several books on leadership, and none of them say to quit when times get tough.
People wonder why we are over budget? In any private business, benefits stop. If they want to continue benefits, they utilize this little known law called Cobra. Why would we give a guy a three year leave of absence who quit so he can collect a pension check. Sorry, buddy, you need to earn it like the rest of us.
I am not sure but Dr...
Back to page topI am not sure but Dr Westerhaus may not have applied initially but may have been approached or pursued unsolicited from another district.
There is so much about all this that we don't know, don't need to know and probably will never know.
As saddened as I am that he is leaving, please let him move on. We must focus on moving forward with the changes and challenges we now face in the district.
Please set a good example for our children and deal with this situation with compassion for all involved. Life is too short and far too precious for all the time and energy being spent on this issue.
With all that's written...
Back to page topWith all that's written regarding the supt of schools decision to leave, and specifically his stated rationale for leaving, why haven't the obvious questions been asked? Isn't he responsible for management of the district's budget? Isn't he responsible for the success/failure of any referendum deemed necessary to operate the schools? In my opinion, he has pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, refocusing the discussion away from his obvious failures and instead blaming a single individual, a former employee, now a board member who the voters elected by a comfortable margin.
EXACTLY! Grow up,...
Back to page topEXACTLY!
Grow up, Westerhaus!
As a new resident...
Back to page topAs a new resident (September), I watched the actions following the recent election with "no dog in the fight", so to speak. And astonishment.
If I'm not mistaken, Westerhaus has voiced "threats" to leave earlier. Especially with that in mind, his recent statements strike me as being akin to a child's "If you don't play my way, I'm gonna take my marbles and go home."
Definitely not behavior that sets an example for Students. And, were I serving on another district's school board, I would keep that in mind in considering any job application.
The divisiveness his words have created is hardly a worthy legacy to leave - and it certainly wouldn’t look good on anyone’s resume.
From having personal...
Back to page topFrom having personal conversations with Dr. Westerhaus, he was very willing to deal with the budget cuts, monetary issues and eveyrthing else surrounding the failed referendum. I think many in the district were disappointed that it didn't pass. His sole reason for leaving is his unwillingness to work for someone who he recommended for termination. Personally and professionally, he couldn't do that.
If I were faced with that, I do not believe I could work for someone in that situation either.
By the way Dr. Westerhaus...
Back to page topBy the way Dr. Westerhaus did not resign.
Last night he asked the School Board to give him a Three Year Leave of absence so he could maintain his medical and TRA contributions.
Passed 7-0 with no discussion.
So what does that cost the...
Back to page topSo what does that cost the Taxpayer?
Are you on this story Prior...
Back to page topAre you on this story Prior Lake American?!? What does this mean for the district financially speaking? Why a 3 year leave of absence? I thought he was applying for other jobs.
Our reporter, Joanna...
Back to page topOur reporter, Joanna Miller, was at last night's meeting where the resignation was discussed. Look for her story today, here on our Web site, and in Saturday's print edition.
I see her story about the...
Back to page topI see her story about the petition. I trust there will also be a story about the 3 year leave of absence.
Savage Guy: the leave of...
Back to page topSavage Guy: the leave of absence story is here: http://plamerican.com/node/4337
Found it. Thanks. No cost...
Back to page topFound it. Thanks. No cost to the taxpayer and it will help Dr. W. Makes sense to me.
Interesting note on the Rule...
Back to page topInteresting note on the Rule of 90 mentioned in the story, I believe that educators throughout the state may see the Rule of 90 go away, and are fighting to keep it in place.
Well at least we know we did...
Back to page topWell at least we know we did not have a true leader on the school board. In times of adversary, is when people need true leaders. I have read several books on leadership, and none of them say to quit when times get tough.
People wonder why we are over budget? In any private business, benefits stop. If they want to continue benefits, they utilize this little known law called Cobra. Why would we give a guy a three year leave of absence who quit so he can collect a pension check. Sorry, buddy, you need to earn it like the rest of us.