News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Prior Lake, Minnesota • (952) 447-6669

Prior Lake Resident's GuideLocal Worship DirectoryPrior Lake Foreclosure Data

Prior Lake, Minnesota

Keep up with the American! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

Oh Boy, Oh Girl...


» Read similar stories filed under:

Breaking news! This just in! J-Lo gave birth to TWINS! A boy and a girl! What bizarre celebro-names she will give them? Will either inherit her acting skills, singing skills, dancing skills...or that million dollar rear? Oh, the questions and curiosities that ping-pong in my head...
I'm kid, of course. However, on a serious note, I would like to comment on this upward trend of celebrity pregnancies. Once considered a liability or hindrance to the entertainment career, babies and pregnancies are now accepted, and even coveted. Swapping Dolce for diapers, Prada for pregnancy, celebrities have found their newest, most prized accessory: babies! It's "trendy" to have a baby now. It no longer hurts your career - it catapults it. The ambiguous baby bumps of "is she or isn't she?", the confirmation of "yes, she is!," the baby bump watch on every magazine, the birth, and finally...the ridiculous marathon race to shed the most baby weight in the least amount of time. The tabloids love it, and we love to read it, whether we admit it or not. Pregnancy is now a celebrity's self-marketing stategy. It guarantees publicity. And it pays to have a baby - big time. Brangelina received 4 million dollars from People magazine to have exlusive rights to Shiloh's first baby pictures. (Yet, I don't blame them, almost; Shiloh is so ridiculously adorable, that it almost hurts my eyes to stare at her.) And it gets worse: People mag has now offered 6 million to Jennifer Lopez to have rights to the first photos of her twins. 6 MILLION DOLLARS! That's insane.
I'm sure many celebrities have babies because they genuinely want them - and I hope that is the majority, the rule, not the exception. Yet, I can't help but wonder how many celebrity couples, or just the women, have babies to propel their career to new heights. How do you guys feel about celebrity pregnancies? Do you trust their motives behind it?

Well, I'm off to watch the Oscars...keeping my eyes peeled for the next celebrity baby bump!

Advertisement. Article continues below.




It's funny you should...

Back to page top

It's funny you should mention this, because I was just saying the same to my friends the other day - that babies seem to be the new Louis Vuitton bags and/or purse dogs for celebrities.
Hopefully, as you mentioned, they're having them for the right reasons, but it does seem like the "baby bump" (a term I hate) is spreading like wildfire in Hollywood.
Here's a question: Did anyone see Nicole Kidman on the Oscars last night? Isn't she supposedly pregnant? I couldn't tell...hopefully she's taking her prenatal vitamins.


Submitted by Lori Carlson on February 25, 2008 - 11:14am.

Babies definitely shouldn't...

Back to page top

Babies definitely shouldn't be accessories! I'd guess we're seeing two cultural shifts here:
1) Hollywood and society are embracing motherhood in a new, real way. Back in the 1950s, they'd hide pregnant women behind a piano or a big vase of flowers to cover the baby bump, as if it were shameful to see a pregnant woman on TV. 2) Hollywood isn't ousting older actresses or moms for younger stars who don't have pregnancies come up as often (the Spears girls being an exception to this idea, of course).


Submitted by Joanna Miller on February 25, 2008 - 12:18pm.

Come on, J-Lo is just "Jenny...

Back to page top

Come on, J-Lo is just "Jenny from the block."


Submitted by Tom Schardin on March 5, 2008 - 1:12pm.

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Advertising

Who's new

  • tom.fredrickson
  • Rachel Henry
  • jamesgilmore
  • StevenGU
  • Jill Schaefer

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 107 guests online.

Advertising

1

Advertising